Michael Knowles REACTS to Civil War Movie
115,499
2024-04-20に共有
Join Michael Knowles as he delves into the intense and gripping thriller "Civil War," where America's future hangs in the balance. In this review, Michael explores the film's portrayal of a nation torn apart by internal strife, focusing on a team of military-embedded journalists on a desperate quest to interview the President in Washington, D.C. He examines the film's narrative depth, character development, and its reflection of contemporary political tensions, offering insights that are as thought-provoking as they are entertaining. Tune in to discover whether "Civil War" stands as a cautionary tale that resonates with today's viewers or simply another dystopian adventure.
Only DailyWire+ members can watch the full episodes of my podcast. Join here: bit.ly/3kj7pOd
LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. / @michaelknowles
Stop giving your money to woke corporations that hate you. Get your Jeremy’s Razors today at ihateharrys.com/
You've seen it played on The Michael Knowles Show, and now you can play YES-or-NO at home. Get it here: bit.ly/45pOROm
Already have the YES-or-NO game? Get your hands on the Conspiracy Expansion Pack before it sells out! bit.ly/3PaR0be
#MichaelKnowles #TheMichaelKnowlesShow #News #Politics #DailyWire
コメント (21)
-
Honestly, most people would probably come away from that movie thinking, "maybe a civil war isn't such a good idea" and I think that's a great message
-
The most unrealistic part of the movie was that the president was inside the White House. If there was a civil war happening on this scale he would have been held in the most secure bunker in the world, probably embedded inside a mountain and in a top secret location. I was expecting a surprise twist where they find out he was not even in the White House.
-
Saw it last night. Appreciate that it wasn’t political at all. Instead it was just a brutal & violent road trip. 8/10 for me.
-
My favorite part was the very realistic alliance between Texas and California.
-
It was smart of them to make Texas and California allies. Great way to take partisan politics out of the movie.
-
You forgot the part where the Dunst character took a photo of her dead journalist friend but then decided to delete the image. That was a turning point for her character but then her protege takes a photo of her death.
-
I saw a very left-leaning (& somewhat infamous) reviewer, Grace Randolph complain that it didn't go far enough- because the British filmmaker elected to not favour one political side over the other...
Interesting perspective from the so-called 'tolerant left' -
Tim Pool actually had a good quote on this. He said "Civil War is apolitical but from an anti-trump perspective. Meaning they don't outright say orange man bad but that's the premise."
The film reminds me of that awful clip from The Newsroom, where the main character is showing off how he's non-partisan by critiquing the Right for being evil and the Left for...not winning enough elections. 🤣 -
the male photographer character (who played Pablo Escobar in Netflix's "NARCOS") didnt stop getting sht faced drunk and stoned throughout the entire movie, not a bad way to wade through complete horrific chaotic madness....
-
It's alarming that people say almost casually say, "The country is coming apart." Think about that.
-
The establishment needs people to fight amongst themselves to continue their own crimes without all eyes on them.
-
The movie isn’t meant to be realistic. In the movie Kristen’s character even said “I took war photos across country hoping to send a message back home saying don’t start a war” in a way this movie is a message to us saying this is what would happen don’t do it. It’s not a political movie, it’s a movie about a war photographer and her perspective she doesn’t care about sides or views. She’s looking for the best shot the whole time. A lot of people missed that for some reason
-
This movie wasn't made by hollywood. It's was made by an independent film company called A24. Independent movies are the futures of film history!!!
-
While I was watching this movie I kept thinking it would have been helpful if I had watched part 1, first.
-
The fact that reviewers/commenters from both sides are saying it's pretty non-partisan is credit to Garland.
To those saying that California and Texas wouldn't team up.... that's kinda the point. If it'd been red vs blue states you lose the non-partisan aspect.
The downside is that doing it that way does remove it's teeth to a degree. Fair play to the makers though. -
Jesus Christ died for our Sins according to the scriptures and that he Was Buried and that he Rose again the third day praise God praying for everyone everyday God bless you All
-
Honestly my biggest gripe with this movie is that Jesse Plemmons was only in it for about 5 minutes! Half the reason I showed up was because he was in the film!
-
Journalists are heroic figures? Sorry but that is too much disbelief to suspend.
-
A wise man called it a Lamborghini with no engine.
-
The one reason this movie isn't total garbage is that it comes from a production company that is hyper aware of what's going on. A24 isn't your typical Hollywood production company they are "independent" and kind of do what they want. A lot of their movies are hit or miss. But they all definitely have a different feel than your typical Hollywood movie.
