HPT Turbo's Quick Spool Technology Ball Bearing System
Published 2024-07-18
Traditional thinking often leans toward smaller sizes for better transient response in the world of turbochargers with seemingly endless options. However, HPT Turbo's Quick Spool Technology (QST) is challenging this convention, offering larger turbochargers that deliver faster spooling and greater power. Utilizing his 4 decades of turbo engineering knowledge, Harry dives into this topic and how he has changed the turbocharger landscape with his newest innovations!
Check out our blog post where we get deeper into our Quick Spool Technology. hptturbo.com/blogs/news/qst
All Comments (15)
-
We want back to back testing against competitors. PTE, Garrett, Xona etc
-
My 6466 is on its way to the UK right now… let’s go 🤙🏼💪🏼😈💯💯💯🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
-
Best out there period!!!!!!!!!
-
Infact what he is doing is genius. Protecting his assets.. he’s up against very large company’s. One of them he was the founder of himself previously… just give it time and everyone will be raving about HPT. Watch this space… hard work and passion wins everytime.
-
Great info. Good to know there's a REAL alternative to Precision. Demonology linked me here.
-
The bearing system is no joke. I went from a precision 6766 .84 t4 to an hpt 6870 .84 t4 and lost 0 spool but gained a 200hp window
-
Backpressure a bigger role than bearing. It’s boost to backpressure ratio, and sure you can have low rpm boost response and low back pressure at high RPM, just use a VNT turbo
-
I like this and all but where are the numbers to back it up? Come on guys get a car with a Garrett XYZ, Precision ABZ and your on there and prove that yours spools better! I’m not saying it’s not true, but it’s just the same marketing BS the other uses without numbers to back it up!….
-
It's still dual ceramic Ball bearings or triplex?
-
There is no real information in this video despite being almost 6 minutes long. All you said was our bearing is better because it is and we say so, no explanations, no drawings, no cutaways, no information. I do understand that there is some intellectual property and development secrets you don't want to give away but just saying your bearing is better because you say so is not exactly informational or a healthy line of promotion to take in my opinion, you might as well have said nothing and claimed everything without any evidence or information to back it up - which anyone can do and kind of what you just did. At the very least if you want to keep the information about your own bearing to an absolute minimum you could inform people of different bearing kinds, drawbacks - benefits - compromises - what makes one better than the other etc, help them also pick out their turbo - give some pointers, tips and tricks about sizing etc instead of saying "Call us, people are surprised"
-
My blouch 3.5 xtr spins for a minute to like 66 seconds.
-
What size is that turbo on your left side ( it is PHUCKING H-U-G-E )
-
After a look at the site, not one compressor map (how can you claim “better aerodynamics” without a flow map?) and not ONE water cooled turbo. With ball bearing turbos using so much less oil (oil restricters being a must) and no water, these things are gonna run HOT. These are Chinese turbos with massive markup. Even some chinese turbos for $300 have water cooling and for $2-$5k it’s not even an option?? I’ve personally never seen a non water cooled ball bearing turbo, and even my cars in the 90s (non ball bearing) came stock water cooled. Btw, no reputable company sells this brand on their site yet I saw another video saying they have been around 30+ years. 😮
-
Pointless video. No information presented, just marketing lingo
