This is B-21 RAIDER: The Key to Winning a War against China

297,749
0
Published 2024-05-21
For years now, the Air Force has been ordering a minimum of 100 B-21 Raiders, at a rate of 10 jets per year to replace its oldest bombers. It will be lucky if it can declare its first squadron operational by 2027. Meanwhile, multiple heads of the Air Force Global Strike Command, along with other observers, have suggested that the U.S. really needs more stealth B-21s.

Most recently, STRATCOM boss Gen. Anthony J. Cotton stressed the importance of producing B-21 Raiders at a faster rate.

Check out these top picks for you:
   • America's M134 Minigun is a Beast  
   • Top 7 Rotary Cannons of the US Military  
   • This is GAU-8 Avenger: Even Tanks Can...  

🔔 Join Here!
youtube.com/channel/UC0bpxzOXueQV7rRPomDiX8A/join

🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
---------------------------------------------
📲 Facebook ► www.facebook.com/USNMil
🐦 Twitter ► twitter.com/USMil_News

Th

All Comments (21)
  • @George_Marshall
    Interesting analysis on the strategic importance of bombers! It's crucial to understand the balance of power and deterrence in modern warfare.
  • Thank you us military for protecting my country phillipines, qnd other alliance country here in asia
  • The B-21 can be used as a drone launcher, launching hundreds of drones at a time.
  • @gpilsitz1783
    Using cargo aircraft as bombers only makes them targets. Those planes are also used for Aeromedical Evacuation missions. No distinguishing markings either.
  • @cvrbon6
    1500 fighter jets? That's just the Air Force alone...
  • The B-2 spirit cost 2 billion dollars each. The B-21 is not the most expensive jet ever made.
  • @bdwilson32
    We have 6,000 more planes than any other country. Nothing to worry about.
  • @HaysClark
    In order to buy more weapons taxes would have to go up in the US which is always unpopular. A lot of folks do not realize the US tax rates previous generations paid to cover war-times. The tax rate for WW1 was 77% and the tax rate during WW2 rose to 94% and remained at 91% for nearly two decades—until 1964. The US coasted for 20 years financially and then just started pilling on National Debt to cover our bills. So, if you want more military toys, then you should be open to raising taxes to pay for them.
  • @TonyL-gw4qx
    Planes that we cannot afford to fly because the maintenance costs are out of control!
  • @cirquemedia
    Was not expecting those sweet Batman logos on the back of the plane!!! Also, Team America >>> F__ yeaaaaaah!
  • @No1DiscoveryTV
    The aircraft's flying saucer-shaped silhouette will surely never cause confusion!
  • @yeeyuket
    China is also developing H20 bombers. The best option is collaboration rather than confrontation.
  • @Horton.1114
    1 trillion dollars a year, that is what America spends annually on its military.. That's all we need,more military equipment so Black Rock can get richer...
  • The bottleneck is not only the bombers themselves, but how many precision-guided missiles/ munitions can the US produce in a certain period of time? A rapid dragon system pallet can drop up to 45 missiles (the size of the deployment boxes is configurable and ranges from 4 to 45 AGM-158B JASSM-ER (extended range) cruise missiles, according to Wiki); that will always be quite a chunk of the total inventory for any expensive weapon.
  • @burntsider8457
    The B1B's efficacy and future may be debatable, but there has never been, nor could there ever be, a more beautiful aircraft.
  • The one thing they do well is make a healthy profit for the usual suspects in the MIC.
  • @aprilthunder
    As with many analyses like this, the strategic advantage of the U.S. nuclear sub fleet is not even mentioned
  • I saw one flying before sunrise, still on TestFlight. Impressive! (The Raider Fleet) Stealthy Birds of the Air
  • I urgently need affordable housing, healthcare and a better infrastructure
  • @Snk13_ty
    You don't have the security clearance to know exactly what we have in terms of numbers of certain planes or types of weapons