Russian Troops Receive Newly Advanced Anti Drone Tanks in Ukraine

399,106
0
Published 2024-06-16
The conflict in Ukraine has witnessed a rise in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, specifically First-Person View commonly known as FPV drones, by both sides. These drones, now equipped with improvised warheads, effectively target armored vehicles, fortifications, and the personnel inside them. Their agility and cost-effectiveness pose a serious threat, as they can carry out precise attacks with anti-tank weapons.
In response to this growing threat, Russia has introduced upgraded anti-FPV drone systems for their tanks to enhance battlefield survivability. This system, known as the Triton tank anti-FPV drone system, includes suppression modules and an antenna mounted on armored vehicles. So, what capabilities does this anti-drone system possess, and is it effective in countering the drone threats?

Subscribe Now :
   / @military-tv  

All Comments (21)
  • @llaka79
    Can you imagine if humanity put all their efforts to eradicate cancer
  • @nunoafonso9378
    There are many anti drone technologies out there that claim to be effective but they all fail to work in any consistent fashion. The 2 more common types either jam or block the control frequencies of the drones or use microwaves to try and burn the electronics of drones. The reasons they fail is because if you jam the frequencies you also jam your own communication devices and electronics who use the same frequencies so you also hurt yourself and your ability to function and communicate. The microwave emitter devices are a pain in the ass to use because you need them to track a moving target and stay on it for enough time to burn the electronics and simple materials available everywhere can be used to block them rendering them useless. Not to mention the challenges involved with projecting microwaves at distances and dispersal problems over distance causing possible damage to unintended targets. I have yet to see an anti drone device work consistently in the field. There are plenty of videos out there made by the manufacturers claiming how great they are but they are all made in controlled variable environments so they can guarantee the result and sell their product. In real life ... that's a different story.
  • @rawprawn8198
    You mean that a country that relies on shovels and refrigerators also has technical capacity? Who would have thought!
  • For every armor invented, there has been invented a penetrator. For every penetrator, there has been invented an armor. And so it goes till 1 of the 2 combatants can no longer conduct combat. The end of this war is closer than it was a year ago, but it is still not close to ending this year. The march to victory continues on both sides.
  • @davefroman4700
    I just saw a video today of a trainload of T-72's showing up in Belgorad last night. They are all equipped with these systems. I just went back to the video and checked.
  • @darkcloud5830
    Russia's anti-drone method: jammed and disabled with signals. US's anti-drone method: we need more firepower.
  • @user-mz6gf6wq6r
    So a new tactic will evolve- mix drones and old fashioned wire guided weapons. Those can’t be defeated by jammers.
  • @Wandjina104
    Newly advanced anti-tank drones meet newly advanced anti-drone tanks. Same result. The age of the tank is over.
  • @magnacarta9364
    Problem is now that drones are incorporating AI capabilities, once a target is targetted AI takes over & no drone operator is required at that point.
  • @malcolmt7883
    An obvious counter would be to have the drone identify its own targets by pattern recognition. No operator needed, but getting close to Skynet territory.
  • @MrDavidoneo
    Just a thought. These antidrone systems probably work by basicly bursting out traffic in entire spectrums of radiotraffic with a fairly high wattage. Wouldnt it be possible to use this to locate the tanks? They are probably online most of the time because tankers will not hear or see something as small as a drone.
  • @ckwong1013
    If the jammer puts out a signal to jam the fpv. Then can you just design a fpv that just lock onto and seek out that signal?
  • @un1g
    and that's the start for AI-controlled drones. Wait and see... the first of its kind is already swimming in the sea and looks like a manta ray.
  • Many of the drones use the commercial 390MHz channels, and some others. These are not like the cellphone frequencies. Also, it is easy to change the frequencies for low frequency drones.
  • @ericwillis777
    Anything which emits a signal can be 'seen' on the battlefield, presumably that signal can be homed in on. In any case, if the supression system is any good they wouldn't advertise it.
  • @leoshell9399
    I love military innovations, especially during the war.... Engineering marvels.
  • @nunya___
    It can't stop a drone with target lock.