Man who bought "residential" firehouse sued by Seattle — for using as residence | KIRO 7 News

5,666,510
0
Published 2020-01-13
The advertisement that grabbed Thom Kroon's attention marketed a no-longer-used fire station as a "unique residential dwelling.” So Kroon purchased the property from the City of Seattle in a 2012 auction. The Seattle man then spent thousands of dollars on interior remodeling, and for more than three years, his extended family and friends used the firehouse for holidays, celebrations, charity fundraisers, graduation parties and as an office until a Land Use Notice of Violation arrived in July of 2016.

Read the full story at bit.ly/2VP8ikW

SUBSCRIBE: youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=KIRO7Seat…

ABOUT KIRO 7 SEATTLE:
KIRO 7 Seattle is your home for breaking news, live video, traffic, weather and your guide to everything local for Seattle and Western Washington.

CONNECT WITH KIRO 7 SEATTLE:
Visit the KIRO 7 Seattle WEBSITE: www.kiro7.com/
Like KIRO 7 Seattle on FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com/KIRO7Seattle Follow KIRO 7 Seattle on TWITTER: twitter.com/KIRO7Seattle
Follow KIRO 7 Seattle on INSTAGRAM: www.instagram.com/kiro7seattle

All Comments (21)
  • @zethjugos1250
    Someone "filed a complaint" simply means somebody who has connections in city hall is interested in the property...glad the owner fought back and won
  • @darkh0st
    Bottom line. Someone with money wanted the land and created some BS lawsuit to try and scare the owner off. The fact that our processes even allowed it to happen to begin with is a huge joke.
  • @monkemode8128
    It's not the worst mistake, but the fact that the city just immediately went to giant fines and ordered him to leave his residence is suspicious.
  • @ivocanevo
    Pay the man's legal fees, rezone his property, apologize, and stop wasting this man's time and Seattle taxpayers' money. FFS
  • @txhookey5608
    It's amazing that a city would waste time and resources on a nice home instead of addressing homelessness and crime.
  • @finally97
    I'm glad that the owner was able to retain adequate counsel. People don't realize how necessary it is that you not only have an attorney but one who is well versed in the type of suit. I'd love a follow-up to this story.
  • @edwinearl4584
    For a city sinking in the excrement of homelessness, suing someone for having a home is irony at its finest.
  • @no-onesname4926
    That man deserves his money back. If they wanted the place to be a historical landmark they should have kept it.
  • @jacobelledge8424
    Way to go Seattle you have rampant crime and homelessness and yet you put your resources into punishing law abiding citizens.
  • @user-ec8kw5ri4k
    Sue the City for all attorney fees and an extra $.5M for trespassing and stupidity.
  • @adrees
    The city was wrong, they admitted as much when the dropped their frivolous lawsuit, and now they should pay all legal fees for putting this man through this.
  • @zeph_os
    For anyone checking in now; the city dropped the lawsuit after he countersued since the paperwork that converted the land use from a fire station to a residential zone "got lost" in the bureaucratic process
  • He bought it from the city and then 3 years later the city told him he can't use it anymore. So messed up he had to sue for the city to drop their rediculous suit.
  • @autobug2
    This station was featured on an HGTV show of some sort a few years ago. He won his lawsuit against the city and kept the place!
  • @lapislazuli1431
    The fact that they dropped the lawsuit when he decided to counter speaks volumes. They definitely tried to extort him and decided it wasn’t worth the hassle when they saw him fighting back.
  • @MouseCIick
    The city sold him the firehouse and the city proceed to sue him. You can’t make this up.
  • @CompTechMike
    We're being harassed by city zoning officials over a supposed "violation" that existed for years prior to us buying the house. We've engaged city council, the mayor, even our local state delegate, as well as an attorney. So far this fight has cost us over $8,000 and a huge amount of mental stress and frustration, but we're determined to stand against harassment. Good for this guy!
  • We need names of the person/ plaintiff of the person to see who they are and to see if they still need to be employed for the city of Seattle.