Paleontologist Reveals Newly Discovered Dinosaurs of 2024 Part 1
8,372
Published 2024-04-05
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel and follow us on Instagram and Facebook for more fascinating updates in the world of dinosaurs and paleontology.
#dinosaur #fossil #paleontology #paleontologist #dinos #jurassicpark #jurassicworld #fossils #science #naturalhistory
All Comments (21)
-
Okay, so when you're wanting to do videos related to paleontology, you have to keep in mind that paleontologists work closely with paleoartists to reconstruct and flesh out the fossils they find and study. Using AI not only poorly reconstructs these long extinct animals, but is also spitting in the faces of paleoartists who put their time and soul into making these beautiful pieces of art that you happen to display in your video. So if you can, please be considerate, and not use AI imagery when posting paleontology videos.
-
62 million years ago? So 4 million years after all the dinosaurs went extinct?
-
I absolutely love learning about dinosaurs and find them incredibly fascinating.
-
And why doesn’t this have more views?!!??
-
You had me at dino guy! Subscribed! 🦕🦖
-
Dinos where in every part of the planet, for 150 M of years, we know the 1% of them, we will keep discovering new ones every day, it's a never ending adventure.
-
Great info and I look forward to more, but as some have noticed the dates are off or wrong. I’m sure it was just a mistake but the correct info is that the newly-identified species, Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, lived between 71 and 73 million years ago, or between 5 and 7 million years before T. rex. 64 million been the mass extinction event. As for the 62 million I’m not sure what creatures were thriving at the time but wasn’t the above-mentioned.
-
Neet discoveries can’t wait to hopefully have figures of those dinosaurs in my collection one day however i differ on the time line 😂
-
You deserve more views and i have subscribed
-
I haven't seen this proposed anywhere yet: Might the strong bony structures (horn protrusions included) on Tyrannosaur faces been a direct response to the Ceratopsians? Yes, ideally one would ambush a ceratopsian to avoid the head armor. Also yes, because T-saurs had their own head armor they could engage in pecking order face-biting. But neither of those preclude an increased survival if a T-saur had to parry C-sian strikes with its face in order to get a good bite. So if the ambush failed, just fight with your head and mouth like a hippopotamus. Big teeth, lots of armor and armament up front to protect the rib cage. No threat of a horn penetrating the nasal area of a T-saur even from a Triceratops, etc. If one can withstand face biting from another T-saur, it can withstand at least a glancing horn blow. Even if just to get clear for the next ambush. I'm still operating under the rule that even though predators don't win every hunt, they also don't die every other hunt. If the situation becomes unfavorable, most predators disengage. Wounds heal, predators survive. For some reason many paleontologists but ceratopsians (prey) on equal footing with tyrannosaurs (predators), which doesn't really work if a T-saur is to live to be 30 years old, ate another big dinosaur weekly, and simultaneously died 50% of all hunts now does it?
-
eoneophron - it does look like a chicken according to this rendering. it also looks like a couple of different animals stuck together - like those mythical beasties in the medieval ages. anyway, i love it :)😋🐓🌷🌱
-
Excellent presentation. I would still go with #1. I have a few fossils and have a T-Rex tooth tip from the Hell Creek formation.
-
It's interesting how some fans of dinosaurs really want them to look like birds.
-
That last part about the titanosaurs describes why titanosaurs were so big and successful near the end times....
-
is your job being a dinosaur guy fulltime? if so thats very cool! i hope you find many and make some cool documentaries.
-
You get a subscriber in me. Beautiful video this. I love all these dinosaurs you mentioned. I loved the explanation you gave to estimate the age of a dino. Awesome 😎
-
Okay... 1) T-Macraeensis didn't live 62 MYA. Why am I so strict you may ask. Because 66 MYA there was a rock... Chixulub impactor to be precise. It hit the ground and thrugh few hundred years dinosaurs were wiped out. Well, 62 is less than 66 isn't it? It is. But the point is that it is BC, so -62 > -66. 62 MYA there were mammals taking place on top of the foodchain.
-
You do realize using Ai for dinosaurs is a treason against the paleontology community but hey , this is pretty good
-
very excellent presentation and you have a great voice for it, too. :)🦜🦕🦖🌷🌱
-
You said that T. Mcraensis lived before T-Rex and lived 62,000,000 years ago. You’re contradicting yourself, since T. Mcraensis lived 62,000,000 years ago, that means the dinosaur lived after T-Rex.