Are the Critics right? Is there REALLY no evidence for a Worldwide Flood? The Flood CONFIRMED!

Let's go, brother Donny! 💪💪💪

Amen SFT 🙏

Great video!

Billions of dead things , covered in mud, layed down by water, all over the earth......

Is Pompeii accurately dated? If so how do we know?

So glad I found your channel Donny…

Every time I think this channel can't get any better, I get proven wrong. Such a blessing to us all. Thank you

Scientist: "we don't know the processes how that giant rock got bent like that".

Anyone can look at photos of the earth and clearly see that there was a global flood.

Name the strata!!

I'm not quite sure how Sal got the idea that the Morrison formation is mainly composed of conglomerates. It actually consists of multiple lithostratigraphic members, some of which are conglomerates, but others that are coarse-grained sandstone, limestone, and chemically altered, clay-rich mudstones derived from volcanic ash. You can even observe cross-bedding in some of the sandstones in this rock unit, which are consistent with meandering rivers flowing across the landscape, punctuated by eruptions from the newly-forming volcanic mountains to the west of Utah. This seems like a deliberate omission on his part, as no legitimate geologist who examined the actual rocks would make this mistake. Furthermore, how could such varied (sometimes interbedded) sedimentary layers be deposited in a single flood event? Second, not all areas of the continent are eroding at the same rate. There are two processes to consider here: uplift AND subsidence. That is, some geographical areas are being uplifted, while others (such as the mid-western basin where the Morrison formation was ultimately deposited) are decreasing in topological height (ie. no erosion is taking place). Creationists seem to have this over-simplistic concept where the continents are mostly flat-lying areas punctuated by large mountains that are constantly eroding away to sea level. This is also ignoring the fact that the rate of uplift is measurably higher than the rate of erosion in certain areas (even as the erosion rate exponentially increases with mountain height). There were several other geology errors made in this video, but I think I'll start with these two for illustrative purposes. If you have to oversimplify reality to make your "flood geology" model work, then it's probably not a good description of said reality.

Plenty of evidence of the flood, and God, but the critic confuses proof with persuasion.

Which flood are we talking about? The 40 day flood or the 150 day flood? J Text / 6 At the end of forty days, Noah opened the window of the ark that he had made. // 8 And he sent out the dove to see whether the waters had decreased from the surface of the ground. 9 But the dove could not find a resting place for its foot, and returned to him to the ark, for there was water over all the earth. So putting out his hand, he took it into the ark with him. 10 He waited another seven days, and again sent out the dove from the ark. 11 The dove came back to him toward evening, and there in its bill was a plucked-off olive leaf! Then Noah knew that the waters had decreased on the earth . 12 He waited still another seven days and sent the dove forth; and it did not return to him anymore. // Noah removed the covering of the ark, and he saw that the surface of the ground was drying. P text // 24 And when the waters had swelled on the earth one hundred and fifty days, 1 God remembered Noah and all the beasts and all the cattle that were with him in the ark, and God caused a wind to blow across the earth, and the waters subsided. 2 The fountains of the deep and the floodgates of the sky were stopped up, // 3 the waters then receded steadily from the earth. At the end of one hundred and fifty days the waters diminished, / 7 He sent out the raven; it went to and fro until the waters had dried up from the earth . The bible has a problem, I guess one writer copied Atrahasis and the other copied Utnapishtim. LOL

The point was made that metamorphic rock could bend while hot. Sedimentary layers would have to have been soft to fold. Will the anti-flood people on here give a good explanation for solid rock bending without crumbling? They will trip over their explanations but not over each other to explain this!