ESPN HOST TAKES A SHOT AT SHAQ ABOUT CAITLIN CLARK BEING ROOKIE OF THE YEAR!

12,165
0
Published 2024-07-18

All Comments (21)
  • @JP-pz5zh
    Those behind the back passes are a thing of beauty.
  • If CC chose the shot over the pass, they'd say she was hogging the ball and padding her points tally! They'll never give her credit! Ever! Their efforts are all in vain, you can't hold back genius!
  • @BobbyU808
    “they woke a monster” prescient words spoken by our girl
  • @Marie-kl5vd
    She became the dynamic player 80 % of players n coaches would not admit in the beginning/ Clark is just all around/ she does it all /even t/o which are negated
  • @bmw128racer
    "Stat gymnastics." That's gold medal stuff. 😁
  • @YanniEhm
    Miss Catie is the Trigger Hippie. She's just getting started.
  • @LouSeph
    They are in the anger stage of grief lmao!!! They wanted CC to fail so bad she broke their brains.
  • @drewkirke3915
    Imagine a world where sports pundits were held accountable for their bad takes… like if the ones consistently making wrong predictions would be putting their career at stake. Lol
  • @Robert-lb8ew
    It is over stats don’t lie and records doesn’t lie,she means more to her club than Reese means to hers
  • @Struwwel2
    If her teammates could catch her passes* and hit layups, CC would have had over 20 assists. *I don't mean Aliyah Boston. She more than held her end up.
  • @Bluzmn
    CC is not only ROTY, but a legitimate MVP contender.
  • @kidlat1969
    There is no competition for ROTY. CC is the chosen one.
  • The Caitlin haters are clearly getting more desperate. It's just pitiful
  • @ads2686
    its amazing how its so many black basketball fans who can see the fact that clark is in a different league, yet its black women in the media are pushing the ROTY race.
  • @artistamisto
    These idiots DO NOT KNOW what stat padding is. They learn a new definition and use it the WRONG way. Stat padding is similar to garbage time POINTS. The game is OUT OF REACH and the player STAYS IN and whatever numbers they get are called Stat padding whether the player cares or not. Some do care and some others just want to play. Keeping Clark in during a CLOSE GAME gives them a BETTER CHANCE TO WIN. The irony is if you listen to Clark interviews she pretty much ho hums at any record of hers that the press throws at her. The WINS make her HAPPY in post game interviews. Her record stats DO NOT make her happy in a loss. The stats are for us fans and the media to debate about. It's funny how REESE FANS are DESPERATELY trying to DEFLECT their "queen's" stat padding over to Clark. Reese is the DEFINITION of stat padding - calling for the ball DOWN 14 PTS with final seconds ticking when most teams just DRIBBLE IT OUT if the score isn't close. Her coach TAKING OUT CARDOSO so Reese can collect more rebounds IS CALLED Stat padding. The Clark padding LIES on the internet are disgusting. One person starts lying, and then all their little monkeys follow them and spread it.