NASA Isn't Telling Us Something About The Moon
316,092
Published 2024-05-25
Last Video: Why NASA Is Developing A NEW Nuclear Rocket!
• Why NASA Is Developing A NEW Nuclear ...
►Become a member today: youtube.com/channel/UCeMcDx6-rOq_RlKSPehk2tQ/join
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: discord.gg/jeZgzNUcBw
► Patreon: www.patreon.com/theteslaspace
► X/Twitter: twitter.com/TheSpaceRaceYT
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: youtube.com/c/TheTeslaSpace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News and Updates
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com/
Business Email: [email protected]
#Spacex #Space #Mars
All Comments (21)
-
Join the official Space Race Discord server and meet like minded people today! - discord.gg/eM9nES3nUz
-
We won't have to bring any food to the Moon on our next trip because we can order out from the local Chinese Russian or Indian restaurants.
-
If nasa needs more computing power than the Apollo missions, my cell phone is available to do the calculations
-
It's made of cheese. They had to change the type of cheese a few decades ago and thats why we haven't been to Mars, which is made of Mars bars, but thats a different story. The moon is more than 4 acres wide and that's a lot of cheese to have to take up there. I hear one day the aim is to make the moon entirely of fresh buffalo mozzarella, I do I hope I live to see that. Whatever cheese the moon is made of, I love it.
-
Oh come on.. we went to the moon in 1969 in a 65 Chevy and two rolls of duct tape..
-
the return to the moon is like fusion power, it’s always just 5 years away.
-
Now you have to do a vid on why the Apollo rocket was able to do it on its own and why we aren't using a similar plan.
-
Can't land on the moon anymore????? Ummmmm that's like saying you forgot how to build a car. You mean to tell me y'all figured it out once but in 60 years of advances in technology you can't figure it out again??? Sounds to me like they never landed on the moon in the first place.
-
Imagine how hard it was in the 60's with all the computer power of a Texas instruments calculator. Amazing😂
-
I'm willing to bet anybody here any amount of money that you will not see Man on the Moon by 2026
-
My view is that Artemis is screwed. BUT it is a forcing function to make orbital refueling happen. I really want orbital refueling to work. It unlocks so much of the solar system.
-
The starship part is like telling a child Santa doesn’t exist to a spacex fan
-
That first 2 minutes reminded me of ‘The Underpants Gnomes’!! Hahaha Phase 1: collect underpants Phase 2: ???? Phase 3: profit. Hehehehe 🧙🏻♀️
-
We put men on the moon 55 years ago using 4 bit, hand wired, analog computers. And yet, here in the 21st Century, we can't look at the all the blueprints and data from The Apollo Program? Your average gaming PC has more computing power that NASA had total.
-
5:01 It's important to note that the Dynetics wasn't chosen mainly because the lander had large negative mass margins in early designs. Meaning that the lander would only work if it lost weight as more of the design was figured out, which is highly problematic and unreasonable at that point in the design. Besides that, Dynetics lacked a lot of the technical expertise that both Blue and SpaceX had
-
It's amazing and impressive that humans went to the Moon, landed, and return to Earth with a fraction of a fraction of the technology we have today. Orson Welles and others have spoken of how creativity and solution finding is increased by the presence of limitations, in the face of hard determination. I also have to think people were simply smarter fifty-five years ago. We certainly had a better education system, and a better educated populace then.
-
14:46 same here I'm a product designer and what you said at the end really resonated with me. What has often happened is that I would describe how to do something to someone and they would say this cannot work, but to me it was so obvious I could not understand how they could not see it. On the other hand, when I look at projects like SpaceX or space travel in general, I'm like, this won't work, this is stupid, but actually I am the stupid one.
-
That whole spaceship landing concept on the moon is crazy. They will never be able to land that tall tower safely on the uneven moon surface without having it toppling down. There is a reason why the LEM looked like a spider 50 years ago.
-
That starship lander always made me nervous, glad I'm not the only one
-
The upshot, however, is that once that Starship lands, they have literally 100 tons of usable payload on the surface. Contrast that to Apollo 11 thru 17, where they only brought 100-250 kg of usable equipment to the lunar surface. This will be a seismic shift in what we can do in space.
