Whose revival? Which Christianity? CS Lewis & Owen Barfield on the renewed interest of belief in God

2,942
0
Published 2024-04-01
There is much talk of a revival of Christianity amongst secular intellectuals, at least in my cultural bubble. That may or may not be sociological significant and church attendence figures stay in marked decline. But what interests me is not so much the numbers as the spirit of the renewed interest. What is the feel of the Christianity being discussed, what attitudes does it embody, what spiritual does it represent?
CS Lewis and Owen Barfield discussed these things and, then, Barfield teased out differences between them after Lewis’s death. He characterised that as the difference between an analytic and romantic rationality, which produces separate even oppositional understandings of God, Jesus, salvation, this world, the imagination, the human and the creation as a whole.
I think that their “oppositional friendship” might illuminate our now, which I try to tease out in this talk.
Recorded in St Mary Magdalene church, Stapleford Park

0:00 The revival now and the differences between Lewis and Barfield
4:25 The Christian story as chasm or participation
8:08 Salvation or participation?
11:20 Exclusive Christianity or porous Christianity?
13:45 The role of reason and the imagination
17:11 Following the head or the heart?
21:21 Analytical and Romantic, allegorical and mythological approaches to truth
27:39 The appeal of Lewis, simplicity and joy
32:02 Polarities, oppositions and Trinitarian perception
35:40 Different experiences of time, culture wars and choice
39:02 What of the future of Christianity?

All Comments (21)
  • @_Anjaneya_
    This presentation is so precise and elegant in its expression because it gets at the very soul of these two streams of consciousness. As someone raised in an Evangelical household where CS Lewis was deeply revered, you unveiled the mind of my youth. Now, after practicing several religions and in many different esoteric schools you have unveiled the contents of my middle-life porous heart. I thank you for vocalizing the mind of the Logos in articulating the nuances of our current fork in the road. This fork was there from the beginning of the Incarnation, but with each generation, the distinctions become more visible and the Individual choice more poignant. I wish my pastoral father could watch this and finally understand the differences between our two perspectives. But there's something about certain Lewis minds that can't truly listen and appreciate the differences of the Barfield mind without feeling threatened or attacked, or just so uncomfortably disoriented that the authentic meaning is grossly misinterpreted. I have learned to stick with universals while interacting with the Lewis mind and the greatest universal in which oneness can emerge is Love. Much appreciated.
  • Thank you so much Mark for the work that you are doing. I really enjoy listening to you not just because of the great care and attention that you put into the content but underneath I can feel your heart and love in all that you are doing. To me it feels like something very precious is happening as the exploration of Christianity is being explored right now. I like that you are slowly teasing out some wonderful teachings that Jesus has been presenting to us and bringing them alive for us all to join you in. Thank you for bringing Barfield's more intuitive, mystical and romantic feel to the Christian way. I feel you are opening the door to Christ in a new way for us all. It feels fun and exciting to be in this exploration together. Thank you.
  • @janchmiel7302
    Totally brilliant. So clear. The distinctions made here are profound as they outline the fundamental differences in how Christianity is perceived too.
  • @MourningTalkShow
    You always make me feel less crazy. I don’t know how I could have been raised so steeped in Lewis and grow steadily towards the Barfieldian flow instead.
  • @Owen_Barfield
    Thank you for an excellent talk which resonates with our times.
  • Shortly after I saw this video posted, I saw, on FB, that Addison Hodges Hart had posted an article from the UK Spectator, written by a British man named Justin Brierley, about this very revival of interest in Christianity. Mr.Brierley also has a new book and companion podcast about this. Mr. Vernon should consider a future YouTube conversation with him. Here in the US, it is unfortunate that we don't seem to have Christian thinkers like Vernon, Lewis and Barfield here. The UK is lucky to have them!
  • @amabodie
    Superb. You bring much clarity and articulation to an otherwise dim sense of things not quite being in tune.
  • @cat_law
    As T.S. Eliot said of poetry, it is "...not the assertion of truth, but the making of that truth more fully real to us." Thanks for this illuminating reflection.
  • @Terpsichore1
    It seems to me we should harmoniously ‘hold’ both their perspectives. We need them both. As an aside - it also seems to me that, anyone still under the illusion that we’re in the midst of a ‘Culture War’ rather than a ‘Spiritual War’, isn’t paying sufficient attention. Thank you Mark.
  • @TheHajah1
    Wonderful sharing Mark, thank you.. feeling very one with the flow.. I love the ‘Poem of Now’. ❤️💞
  • Mark, this talk is amazing and timely - couldn't we have a twelve-chapters book from you expanding upon each of these polarities for the general reader? It would be an absolute spiritual gift . Many, many thanks.
  • @02sweden
    I think that something is happening. I decided to go to the local church (Swedish evangelical lutheran church) for 1 hour christian meditation/contemplation friday afternoon. I was very surprised when i saw the gathering of people there, at least 30 persons, that i didn´t expect on a friday at dinner time. Then when my family tried to participate a traditional lunch at the same church easter day, it was all full booked. People are looking back, in to the old traditions more than 10 years ago. It is the time we live in, the confusion, and the common problem we face i think. The other tradition, especially the non dual and buddhist ones, have helped people to look in to what Christianity has to offer. On top of that, in popular culture, the TV-series "The chosen" have made an impact on young people. And it is as you say, two sides of the coin of "the revival", a romantic and a more "explanatory" strain that interest people.
  • You have bought back memories of Narnia and my favourite idea from it...... 'he/ Aslan, is not Tame lion you know. ' we can never fully own joy or imaginations ....
  • @ElizabethMohr
    I really appreciate your clear articulation of these two approaches to sacred understanding and the living of it. Thank you. Your detailed examination of these authors draws into relief a distinction that is useful for dialogue moving forward. Peaceful and creative dialogue, with a significant potential for healing and reconciliation, especially if the complementarity of the two ways of understanding is held sacred. I'm very curious as to whether Barfield had any exposure to the works of Emmanuel Swedenborg. At first glance there seems to be quite an affinity there. I do have your book and look forward to listening in for more detail. Asking in advance nonetheless after hearing this discussion, though.
  • @kevinperry8221
    I am astonished to say that I feel like I am, in fact, undergoing this process of "slow conversion". That thought would have made me angry, twenty five years ago. Listening to the likes of you, Rupert Sheldrake, and David Bentley Hart has been instrumental. Thank you!