Must needed Wrangler Rubicon 392 MOD - Fox 2.5 DSC Adjustable shocks - Better than stock?

Published 2022-10-05

All Comments (7)
  • @DeadOnTrail
    I look forward to your review. I do a ton of offroading so I think I'm gonna do the 3.0s the one thing is. The 2.5s you can get a 12in travel shock where the 3.0 it's an 11in at the most so less travel. But Casey currie has the 3.0s on there trucks and they seem to work great.
  • @adriand137
    You mentioned in another vid that you were going to add height spacers, did you add them and what size? Did they impact the ride quality and will you do a video? Love the channel!
  • Definitely will get the 3.0 for my 392XR. Nice video tho!!!!
  • @jonluchessi1643
    I got the Fox 2.5 adjustable shocks for my 392 they were OK but I really wasn’t that impressed I don’t feel there’s enough rebound dampening for example concrete slabs on the highway, I think they’re OK I took plenty of notes during my adjustments and could never really get them tuned right. I feel if fox would build a shock with rebound adjustment along with what comes with the shock high and low speed compression dampening it would be much better, the quality & build is fantastic but the Valving just wasn’t right and I know they can be revalved it’s a simple process but the process of sending them back and forth is an expense time consuming and a big hassle and then there’s king shocks but my experience with those there is only one compression dampening adjustment and after two months of owning the shocks without even hard use two shocks were leaking oil, It’s a big expense on these high end items I think they need to make them a little better with a little more adjustment for the consumer
  • @doughooks7411
    Dang Asfar! You’re going to need a parking garage there! 😂. Thanks for the video!
  • @LP63.
    Did you find that these 2.5s ride stiffer on the street than the stock shocks? Want to get them but was curious