The Insane Engineering of Orbit

1,715,062
0
Published 2023-12-22
Sign up to Brilliant using my link and get a 30 day free trial AND 20% off your an annual subscription: brilliant.org/realengineering

Watch this video ad free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/realengineering-the-insane-engine…

Links to everything I do:
beacons.ai/brianmcmanus

Get your Real Engineering shirts at: standard.tv/collections/real-engineering

Credits:
Producer/Writer/Narrator: Brian McManus
Head of Production: Mike Ridolfi
Senior Editor: Dylan Hennessy
Research Assistant: Josi Gold
Animator: Eli Prenten
Animator: Stijn Orlans
Sound and Production Coordinator: Graham Haerther
Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster
Head of Moral: Shia LeWoof

References:

Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images
Thank you to AP Archive for access to their archival footage.

Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator

Thank you to my patreon supporters: Abdullah Alotaibi, Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Hank Green, William Leu, Tristan Edwards, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Thomas Barth, Johnny MacDonald, Stephen Foland, Alfred Holzheu, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Binghaith, Brent Higgins, Dexter Appleberry, Alex Pavek, Marko Hirsch, Mikkel Johansen, Hibiyi Mori. Viktor Józsa, Ron Hochsprung

All Comments (21)
  • @withoutstickers
    One thing a lot of people get wrong is that the idea that the shuttle was in orbit when it dropped the tank. When the engines shut down the tank and the shuttle were on the same orbital trajectory that intersected the atmosphere. This meant the shuttle had to boost itself at the highest point of its orbit using the OMS to avoiding reentering the atmosphere with the tank.
  • @MrSwitzerland88
    please do more space-themed engineering! absolutely love this
  • @AnyWayICan
    The final push into orbit is not from the main engines, but from the orbital maneuvering system (OMS). If the orbiter was in orbit at main engine cutoff (MECO) then the jettisoned tank would remain in orbit rather than burning up in the atmosphere.
  • @bholdr----0
    Absolutely fascinating. I enjoyed how the vid used the story of one interesting and challenging mission to illustrate many of the functions and capabilities of the entire shuttle system-of-systems.
  • @danielmartinezf
    I just presented my Launch Systems final project a few hours ago and I can absolutely tell you that rocket science is on a whole different level. The level of detail that goes into every aspect of these vehicles is just amazing and every single aspect is painstakingly scrutinized to a level the general public has never seen
  • @davetremaine9688
    The Space Shuttle had it's faults, but man what a beautiful iconic machine. When the world came together to make the ISS America came to the table with a combination of an airplane, a school bus, and a pick up truck.
  • @TheHatManCole
    Could you do a video on the insane engineering of the LM? I find this ship so meaningful because it is the only craft ever designed to carry humans to fly only in 0 atmosphere conditions, which is why it looks so weird. I think this is very meaningful to engineering history because the fact that we needed a ship to carry people in 0 atmosphere conditions says a lot about how far we have come as a species. Thank you.
  • @Phriedah
    I got your subtle joke at 14:50, "As Goddard intended" - well done.
  • @Sam_596
    "As Goddard intended" Solid gold line
  • @mikedicenso2778
    @ 11:25 The Chandra/IUS stack was not the maximum limit for the Shuttle fleet in general, only for OV-102 Columbia, which was 3.6 metric tons heavier than her newer sisters, and it was Columbia that flew that mission since she was the only orbiter at the time that had not been outfitted with an external airlock and therefore was capable of holding the 56 foot (17 meter) stack in her payload bay. As it was, the mission was only possible for Columbia because of the recent introduction of the super lightweight aluminum-lithium external tanks, which shaved off 8,000 lbs (3.6 mt) in mass from the overall Shuttle launch stack and therefore added a roughly equivalent amount to the payload mass to orbit.
  • @Spartan2035
    The more I learn about the shuttle, the more I'm surprised how well every single part was thought out. They even had covers for the flight sticks! And the capture mechanism on the Canadarm is just 💯
  • @wolfbd5950
    14:45 "...allowing any two spacecraft to dock together, as Goddard intended." Thank you for this - it made me burst out laughing in the middle of a crowded restaurant.
  • @neoanderson7
    The Shuttle was truly a feat of engineering. Kudos to the crew involved in telling a great piece of history.
  • @Chriss120
    This truly deserves a mini series. Your videos are always great to watch, good job.
  • @NobleOmnicide
    Excellent series. This is the type of content YouTube SHOULD be promoting.