🕉️ Spiritual gain is the ultimate achievement in life.

Swamiji, you bring peace in our life through your knowledge and understanding of religion and spiritualism .

🌺🙏🌺🙏🌺🙏🌺

Whatever is real is right here 🙏

This is one of the most revealing teachings, I have heard from the Swami . Thank you for uploading it!

Hari Om tat sat

Everything in life appears to awareness Everything in life appears in awareness Everything is nothing but awareness

Spiritual gain is the ultimate gain! तामसिक सुख राजसिक सुख सात्विक सुख

Om shanti

Super knowledge from a great swamiji

Good

👍

I really would love swami sarvapriyananda to answer this question in regard to solipsism. Solipism to me means that i can only be sure of my conscious experience, everyone else's conscious experience I can not perceive directly so there fore I can't be sure that there is any other consciousness besides mine, but further, my question/statement is that if I was not here to perceive this world it would not exist, how can I ever be sure that if I wasn't here that everyone else would be here without me ? I know he will probably say it is unsolvable and bring up that there is a million things you cant prove but that doesnt mean they are logocally correct etc but this is a fact that I just can't seem to get my head around. If I was not here, how could I be sure that any of this exists apart from my own experience of it , maybe it's not solipsism maybe I am just saying that because , I am here, it calls all of this world into existence for me, and then it does the same for everyone else's individual dissociated consciousness segment, but how could i ever be sure of that if i were not here to see it, then it would not exist, nor would I. Is the answer also perhaps that solipsism is correct but only from the stance of the highest level of existence i.e. the mind at large, ultimate ground, the all etc. And that mind at large is the only thing that does exist and that's why we/I get this underlying conundrum? I would love to hear your answer Swamiji, I realize also by asking you this, it defeats my solipstic p.o.v. but maybe it doesn't because at the highest level you are me and I am you ultimately not egoically, and everyone and everything is 1 non dual base reality. So at the deepest core in a way solipsim would be correct as brahman. Which we are/arentI really would love swami sarvapriyananda to answer this question in regard to solipsism. Solipism to me means that i can only be sure of my conscious experience, everyone else's conscious experience I can not perceive directly so there fore I can't be sure that there is any other consciousness besides mine, but further, my question/statement is that if I was not here to perceive this world it would not exist, how can I ever be sure that if I wasn't here that everyone else would be here without me ? I know he will probably say it is unsolvable and bring up that there is a million things you cant prove but that doesnt mean they are logocally correct etc but this is a fact that I just can't seem to get my head around. If I was not here, how could I be sure that any of this exists apart from my own experience of it , maybe it's not solipsism maybe I am just saying that because , I am here, it calls all of this world into existence for me, and then it does the same for everyone else's individual dissociated consciousness segment, but how could i ever be sure of that if i were not here to see it, then it would not exist, nor would I. Is the answer also perhaps that solipsism is correct but only from the stance of the highest level of existence i.e. the mind at large, ultimate ground, the all etc. And that mind at large is the only thing that does exist and that's why we/I get this underlying conundrum? I would love to hear your answer Swamiji, I realize also by asking you this, it defeats my solipstic p.o.v. but maybe it doesn't because at the highest level you are me and I am you ultimately not egoically, and everyone and everything is 1 non dual base reality. So at the deepest core in a way solipsim would be correct as brahman. Which we are/arent

You're really buying into the fantasy that spirituality is some sort of achievement. It is not. When we die we no longer exist. So nothing we "attain" here matters.