How Is Prophet Muhammad Mentioned In the 4,000 Years Old Book Of Hinduism?

He's saying 100% truth before I came to Islam I have studied almost all religion i was in ashram and i asked all this questions to a pandit but they have no idea about it. They are searching answers in the air. But alhamdulila i found light in the darkness. Allah akbar

As a Hindu who has read the scripture, let me clarify - 1. The Bhavishya Purana and Shlokas mention "Maha-madh" (meaning always drunk), not "Mohammed". Mahamadh is a demon that spreads evil. 2. There is absolutely no mention of any Mamah in Rig Veda. 3. Kalki is an Avatar of Lord Vishnu and will be born 427,000 years later. Again, nothing to do with Mohammed. 4. No Ahmad is mentioned in the Sama Veda. 5. The translations presented in this video are not only incorrect, but fake and completely made up. This video is meant for those who don't understand Sanskrit or Hindi, and cannot question the authenticity of the fake translations. 6. Words like "asur" and "pishach" meaning "demons" and "ghosts" are completely ignored. These verses are about demons, not Mohammed.

I am not hindu but Sanskrit scolar mha madha means intoxicated in Sanskrit

Half information is given in the video please search what bhavishya puran says about the characteristics of muhammad

Islam didn't need you, You need Islam. Islam is with or without you ❤☝

Our prophet Muhammad s.a.w.w is the blessing for all mankind ❤️

your ability to misinterpreting information is just mind blowing...just hire a better editor that boys clips has so many cuts in it.

The word is “Mahamadha”, not Muhammad and the context in the purana is describing someone’s quality. Maha = bigger and madha = force, described as a virtue of a great and powerful master. The English translation left out the “ha” at the end of “mahamad”

Didn't expect that people could misinterpreted sacred texts to this extent

As a Hindu, I'm indeed proud of Sanatan Dharma and the extremely rich scriptures. Coz Sanatan Dharma exists since time immemoriam, which has no beginning nor end

I'm not hindu, but can any hindu debunk this video with a response video before this guy starts saying "Hindus were Muslims".

महामद इति ख्यात when translated properly the sanskrit word is is MAHĀ-MADA - which means “the greatly intoxicated” one and not Mohammad. Maha means greatly and mada mean intoxicated.

Now as an Indian it's our duty to spread this message to them. 🇮🇳

📌 For surely it is not the eyes that are blind but the hearts } -Quran 22:46

Pls post those pages mentioning predicting the above said description is printed, by video or by other means😮Thanks

Surah Al- Hajj, verse 46, Allah gives this dire warning: "It is not the eyes that are blind, but their hearts

I found this years ago through Dr Zakir Naik. Alhamdullilah , Allah SWT made by belief even more firm.

I am a Hindu, i find no reason why muhammad cannot be mentioned in the Hindu texts. The splitting of the moon is historically recorded in Indian texts witnessed by an Indian king from somewhere around the state of Gujarat Hindus today have left their scriptures. For them today being hindu only means fighting muslims rather than studying hindu texts and scriptures being knowledged in the sacred books. Rightly said in the video only 50k people know Sanskrit, the language of Hinduism. I am a chosen one in this case. Majority Hindus have left their language, their books scriptures and sacred texts, they can't decode them, they brought Hinduism to ruins. They never study their religion. And they accuse muslims for the downfall of Hinduism. For a hindu, seeing these things is upsetting. People are murdered by parties in the name of the religion you follow. Clearly Hinduism never preached any of the ideas practiced by the extreme right

4:34 do you know how to translate?

Now as a hindu my faith in sanatan dharm and vedas had increases even more. That our vedas and scriptures are that much truth . ❤ Love to evryone. Jai sanatan dharm 🕉️🔱