Chicago Milwaukee Hiawatha HSR ? | Taking Back The Rails | Chicago Hub Network

8,204
0
Published 2024-04-23
What would passenger rail look like if the freight companies DIDNT own the vast majority of the rail rights of way in the United States? What if, instead, those routes were dedicated to providing high speed passenger rail service? This sub-series seeks to go beyond the hype and find out if the freight rail rights of way are even any good for the purpose. We'll start with a classic passenger rail route: the old Milwaukee Road Hiawatha between Chicago, Illinois and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This same route is currently used by Amtrak for their Hiawatha Service. We'll take a look at what the current route can bear, electrified and freed of its freight rail constraints. We'll also look at fast HSR could reasonably get, and compare that to a higher speed diesel-electric option. In other words, we're Taking Back The Rails!

Image Attribution:

"A Hiawatha Service train at Glenview station in October 2018"
by David Wilson
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

Lucid Group Discord Channel Invite:

discord.gg/y9rcQ8uWdH

Chapters:

0:00 Hey It's Your Old Pal Lucid Stew
0:22 Purpose of Taking Back The Rails/Chicago
3:05 Suburban Chicago Issues
6:04 High Speed North of Rondout Illinois
6:42 More Issues Near and North of the Wisconsin Border
7:46 Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport
8:58 Milwaukee/Why electrify?
9:40 Milwaukee Intermodal Station
10:36 Let's Upgrade!
11:39 Let's Compare!
12:30 Conclusion/Up Next
12:52 See You On That Big, Beautiful Freeway!

Topics:

High Speed Rail
HSR
Freight Rail
Chicago
Milwaukee Road
Hiawatha
Chicago Union Station
Passenger Rail
Nationalization of Rail
Mandated Electrification
Union Pacific
Regional Rail
Commuter Rail
METRA
Western Ave. Station
Grand Ave. Facility
Diamond Crossing
OWLS
At-grade Crossing
Grade Separation
Morton Grove Illinois
METRA North Glenview Station
Glenview
Rondout
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
Green Oaks
Illinois
Wisconsin
Rosecrans
Milwaukee Subdivision
Chicago & Milwaukee Subdivision
Sturtevant Wisconsin
Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport
Oak Creek
Electrification
Diesel-Electric
Siemens Charger
Milwaukee Intermodal Station
Interstate 794
The Hop
Deerfield

All Comments (21)
  • @mendopolis
    The economic impact of the expensive option to make Milwaukee and Chicago just 36 minutes apart is super intriguing.
  • Its like 2:15 am rn and I wanted to go to sleep, but this is more important to watch
  • @andykillsu
    This is such a sensible thing that should be done. For how close and how large Chicago and Milwaukee are, we really should have faster train service. 45 mins from downtown to downtown would be AMAZING. And it would absolutely get the ridership. The Hiawatha is already one of Amtraks most profitable lines outside the NEC, this would make it so much better. Like I wouldn’t be surprised if Brightline comes in and makes this happen for their start in Brightline Midwest.
  • @rwdavidoff
    As your numbers suggest, I think the potential of even 110-125 mph rail with frequent service avoiding freight holdups (call it Brightline Florida-style rail) in a lot of midwestern markets like this is really interesting, and the costs are really quite low and attractive given the return and possibility of creating whole new regions of rail users. Or, it could pay for about half of one tunnel in the NEC. Alas.
  • @GOPGonzo
    A more interesting option would be "Putting Back the Rails". Look into the option or relaying the Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee main line. That was an electric railway that operated off of a connection with the Chicago L system. It was running dedicated 100+ mph electrified passenger service in the 1940s. The main line has largely been turned into walking paths, but with one exception where an industrial park crosses the path, could be returned to railway use.
  • @nicholasorr4230
    Your estimated speed between Union Station and the Milwaukee airport is only ~6 minutes slower than taking the blue line to O’Hare. Just based off of fact that alone, the ticket revenue would pay back the construction costs in about two years
  • @darynvoss7883
    Top notch as usual. One thing that passenger rail advocates sometimes miss is that making things tougher for rail freight can has bad environmental consequences, if it increases the incentive to switch to road freight...
  • @P0w2you
    Could we keep going to Minneapolis/St. Paul? This Milwaukee Road trains use to average 112~mph in the 1930's so I assume the Geometry gets better as you go northwest.
  • @jjcorp3535
    Didn't realize how close Chicago and Milwaukee actually are.
  • @Pystro
    Speaking of radical changes: With the situation at MKE airport I immediately had the urge to swap the rail alignment and Howell Avenue, since that would eliminate the shuttle bus, saving another few minutes for passengers going to the airport. (Also, any buses going to either location would likely want to stop at both the airport and the rail station, which would be a single stop instead of two if they were in the same place.) I was surprised to find out that they are basically perfectly aligned to have the rail go down Howell Avenue. You would "just" need to evict 50-ish houses on Greeley Street to get it connected back to a rail alignment on the Milwaukee side. Oh, and a series of businesses would loose freight rail sidings.
  • @Skip6235
    I mean, consistent 110 mph between Chicago and Milwaukee would be a huge upgrade from the current Amtrak service which crawls
  • Instead of making the a Rail trench for the crossings, you could have the road go over or under the tracks. That’s what they are doing with CHSR
  • @tazareal
    I think this should be done on the old CNW shore line to Milwaukee, a lot more people could benefit, like Metra passengers as well.
  • @weenisw
    I would analyze departing from Ogilvie and taking the UP-NW to the video’s first diamond crossing in Mayfair but avoid crossing it by veering onto the abandoned ROW that is now the Skokie Valley Line Trail (I say this as a frequent user of that trail but willing to sacrifice it back to better and higher use). This merges with the Northern end of the CTA Yellow Line which quickly ends. Beyond is more abandoned ROW that used to be a fast bypass line to express to Milwaukee without stopping at the local North Shore communities (like the UP-N does). The corridor is used for transmission lines so we have more reason to electrify. I believe this is the straighter alignment that @Lucidstew wanted to switch over to. It will have less curves to straighten but grade crossings and bridges and replacing the removed track up until Northbrook will be expensive.
  • @Whatneeds2bsaid
    Great video as always! Chicago will always be a tough to crack, because of the dizzying number of at grade crossings—both road and rail! Not to mention Metra further complicating the rail operations. After much deliberation and considering Chicago’s context, I settled on converting Metra service to an El train directly over the existing tracks with enough clearance for freight and HSR. Local trains get the El, HSR and freight get the original tracks.
  • @chuli66zx
    Another great video! Shame that Talgo was screwed over by Wisconsin. Their dual-mode high-speed trainsets might have been great for this route, they're now even making a dual mode hydrogen-electric version of the Talgo 250, which can go 155 mph.
  • @Mike__B
    Awww I was hoping to see The Milwaukee Road Hiawatha color scheme with pantographs over the cars, including the dome view end car
  • @johnaayyy3424
    Can u put some kinda speedometer in the corner of these videos
  • @RVail623
    Why couldn't Chicago's Metra, Amtrak & CTA get together and create a unified transportation station, located at Mayfair, Illinois? That would allow for more convenient transfers between the CTA subway line serving O'Hare airport and Mayfair, where Amtrak's Hiawatha or other northbound trains already transit through, but do not stop, until the Glenview station some 12 miles further north.